Hitman Codexery — Data & Quality

We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.

This is a fiction/fan codex: entries describe an in-universe canon. Our audits check canon and internal consistency — external fact-checking does not apply the way it does on real-subject codexes.

Last full accuracy audit: 2026-08-26 · 30 entries checked · 8 flagged · 20 issues confirmed · 8 corrected · 12 still open

Recent findings (audit lane, verbatim)

Diana Burnwood — The entry states Diana divided remaining ICA resources between herself and 47, but canon shows she explicitly said she divided the remaining resources between them, so the claim that she did not formally divide all remaining resources is a factual error.

Agent 47 — The statement that 47 'maintains a strict code of conduct regarding collateral damage' is not consistently supported in canon; while he avoids unnecessary killing in some missions, he has no formal code and has caused collateral damage in certain scenarios (e.

Agent 47 — The claim that 47 'has developed personal bonds with key figures in the agency, particularly Diana Burnwood' is overstated; while they have a professional rapport and occasional moments of trust, their relationship is primarily transactional and not depicted a

Third Party — The entry states the game was released in 2004 by IO Interactive and Eidos Interactive, but IO Interactive did not publish it; the phrasing is misleading.

Third Party — The entry claims the game 'serves as both a remake of Hitman: Codename 47 and a direct sequel to Hitman 2: Silent Assassin.' This is inaccurate; Hitman: Contracts is not a direct sequel to Silent Assassin.

Providence — The statement that Diana Burnwood 'opposes Lucas Grey and ultimately kills him' is factually incorrect; Diana and Lucas Grey are allies, and Lucas Grey is killed by Agent 47 (or optionally the player) in the mission 'The Farewell' in Mendoza, not by Diana.

Fiber Wire — The entry states Hitman: Absolution is the 'fifth installment in the series following 2006's Hitman: Blood Money.' This is incorrect; Hitman: Absolution is the fifth main installment, but it follows 2012's Hitman: Absolution itself? Actually, the flag's own or

First Contract Execution — The claim that 47's first official contract for the ICA began in Hong Kong, China is incorrect; his first official ICA assignment is the assassination of the Red Fox in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

First Contract Execution — The statement that 47's DNA is a clone of five individuals including Dr. Ort-Meyer is inaccurate; the fifth donor is a separate, unnamed individual, not Dr. Ort-Meyer.

World of Assassination Saga — The entry states that Agent 47 is 'a rogue agent hunted by the ICA' at the start of the saga. In canon, 47 is not hunted by the ICA at the beginning of Hitman (2016); he is still an active ICA agent.

World of Assassination Saga — The entry claims Diana Burnwood is 'later revealed to have been a mole within the ICA working for Providence.' In canon, Diana is not a mole for Providence; she is secretly working against Providence from within the ICA, having been blackmailed by them.

Colombia — The entry is titled 'Colombia' but describes the Mendoza mission, which is set in Argentina, not Colombia.

Open data

All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap

Corrections

Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.

← back to Hitman